<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/tag/white-house/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Wants You to Watch Fox News</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend, the White House gave Fox News a sharp elbow, restarting the periodic debate about whether Fox News is actually news. This is rather like asking whether Daffy Duck is actually the Chrysler Building. Of course it’s not. Everyone knows it’s not. Why would the White House bother to bring it up?[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Your House is the White House: Are the Obama Girls in the Public Too Much?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/198/when-your-house-is-the-white-house-are-the-obama-girls-in-the-public-too-much</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/198/when-your-house-is-the-white-house-are-the-obama-girls-in-the-public-too-much#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>showse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/198/when-your-house-is-the-white-house-are-the-obama-girls-in-the-public-too-much</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refreshingly, no.  The President and First Lady appear to be working hard to insure that Malia (11) and Sasha (8) get all the grand experiences and none of the media fall-out that seem to be a part of the lives of First Children.
Anyone making this argument is likely motivated by their relative youth.  Not since [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/198/when-your-house-is-the-white-house-are-the-obama-girls-in-the-public-too-much/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facts and History of the White House</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Built]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What facts and history of the White House do you know? In 1790, President George Washington declared the federal government should reside &#8220;not exceeding ten miles square&#8230;on the river Potomac.&#8221;  Then with Pierre L&#8217;Enfant, they chose the now 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue location for the White House and planned the future federal city around it.
The first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Announces Healthcare Reform Timeline</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reforms-timeline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a surprising gathering of healthcare moguls, President Obama announced his plan to reform healthcare in the United States. Even more surprising is the confident timeline he placed on the measure. Obama vowed by the end of 2009 to address three key issues related to US healthcare policy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Cut Credit Cards</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama recently announced plans to reform complicated and misleading credit card practices.  It is going to be hard for critics to point out fault in Obama's plans without appearing crooked or unsympathetic in the eyes of the public. Reading that fine print has become essential to anybody signing up for a credit card, but with so many unfamiliar financial abbreviations, percentages and numbers to sort through, understanding exactly what you're signing up for can bring you to tears. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea Missile Launch Approaches</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missilie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six-Party Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Korea claims it is a peaceful, scientific endeavor, while the rest of the world, particularly the US, Japan and South Korea, doesn’t buy it. The United States has warned that the launch would trigger harsher sanctions against the communist country, although China would probably use its veto power in the United Nations Security Council to block any attempt to tighten restrictions. As the Japanese and United States deployed their anti-missile defense systems this week, the situation has become a royal mess.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Buying Toxic Assets; Dow Jumps 497 Points; Hope Restored?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones industrial average]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some call it 'cash for trash', while Morgan Stanley believes it will do some good for the credit markets. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner revealed the Obama administration's plan to help buy up to $1 trillion in bad bank debt. These toxic assets have been weighing heavily on the financial and banking institutions, limiting their ability to loan money and making credit hard to come by for many families.  The plan was met with general approval from Wall Street investors, as the Dow Jones industrial average skyrocketed 497 points, making March 23, 2009 the fifth largest single-day point gain ever. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Endorsement Hurt Roger Wicker</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Wicker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although endorsed by other less controversial Republicans, the endorsement of Roger Wicker for Mississippi&#8217;s Senate seat by President Bush could spell doom for this appointed Senator. Taking office after the retirement of Trent Lott, Wicker is running for reelection. Bush pointed out his respect for his constituency and his colleagues, calling him and advocate for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History of Scandal – Past, Present, and Future?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the onslaught of every new politician into the political arena we see what seems like the same promise over and over, “I’m not like the other guys.”   Unfortunately with the passage of time and intensified scrutiny there are few to none that seem to be able to play the game of politics without at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

