<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/tag/obama/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obligatory Nobel Post</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/229/obligatory-nobel-post</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/229/obligatory-nobel-post#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/229/obligatory-nobel-post</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

It appears that, as a writer for the interwebs, it is incumbent upon me to comment on President Obama’s Nobel Prize. Everyone, it seems, is ambivalent about his receiving the prize, not least Obama himself. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/229/obligatory-nobel-post/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Have To Defend It, It’s Probably Racist</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/222/if-you-have-to-defend-it-it%e2%80%99s-probably-racist</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/222/if-you-have-to-defend-it-it%e2%80%99s-probably-racist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>showse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/222/if-you-have-to-defend-it-it%e2%80%99s-probably-racist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to believe that anyone in our nation, with its history, could be genuinely confused about whether or not something is racist.  There’s been so much attention in the media recently on attempts to justify racist images or remarks.  The unfortunate truth is that the structure of our very social fabric in this country [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/222/if-you-have-to-defend-it-it%e2%80%99s-probably-racist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich on Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Newt’s on a roll again with another hot topic; Health Care Reform. He has even founded the Center for Health Transformation which is researching and developing a new plan for better Health Care Reform without creating more taxes and cutting more jobs; just the type of plan American needs with its current economy. Newt strongly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Announces Healthcare Reform Timeline</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reforms-timeline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a surprising gathering of healthcare moguls, President Obama announced his plan to reform healthcare in the United States. Even more surprising is the confident timeline he placed on the measure. Obama vowed by the end of 2009 to address three key issues related to US healthcare policy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Cut Credit Cards</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama recently announced plans to reform complicated and misleading credit card practices.  It is going to be hard for critics to point out fault in Obama's plans without appearing crooked or unsympathetic in the eyes of the public. Reading that fine print has become essential to anybody signing up for a credit card, but with so many unfamiliar financial abbreviations, percentages and numbers to sort through, understanding exactly what you're signing up for can bring you to tears. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States Moves to Get Iran Talking</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/129/iran_nuclear_talks</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/129/iran_nuclear_talks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian Nuclear Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Haass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing Iran to continue uranium enrichment during the first phases of negotiations would have President Bush in a flutter. The former president stood his ground on issues pertaining to talks with Iran, demanding they stop their nuclear program before negotiations could take place. By accepting Iran's continued enrichment practices for a bit during the talks, President Obama is taking another step towards separating himself from the former president's strict, all-or-nothing, no compromise, hard-line, take no prisoners approach to foreign relations and diplomacy. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/129/iran_nuclear_talks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fidel and Raul Castro Meet With Members of US Congress</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Delegation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba Embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Castro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking away from a meeting with Cuban President Raul Castro on Monday, the leader of a seven-member Congressional delegation, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), is convinced that the Cuban President would be willing to reexamine the diplomatic relationship between the United States and Cuba. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea Missile Launch Approaches</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missilie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six-Party Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Korea claims it is a peaceful, scientific endeavor, while the rest of the world, particularly the US, Japan and South Korea, doesn’t buy it. The United States has warned that the launch would trigger harsher sanctions against the communist country, although China would probably use its veto power in the United Nations Security Council to block any attempt to tighten restrictions. As the Japanese and United States deployed their anti-missile defense systems this week, the situation has become a royal mess.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/127/north-korea-missile-launch-approaches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New AmeriCorps – To Give or Have to Give</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a surface level it seems almost silly not to be in support of a program intended to bring about aid to those in need across America, but opponents to the expansion of AmeriCorps raise several key points about the timing, cost, and in essence the “mandate” to serve.  The House has already backed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hugo Chavez: Obama an &#8220;Ignoramus&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignoramus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Sunday, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez shared his thoughts on new US President Barack Obama's policies and comments about the South American country's government. It wasn't pretty, although it fit appropriately with Chavez's stance toward the US. The remarks are reminiscent of comments made in a January interview that compared President Obama to his predecessor.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GIVE Act Passed By House 321-105</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIVE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US House of Representatives passed a measure Wednesday, March 18th 2009, by a vote of 321-105 creating 175,000 &#8220;new service opportunities&#8221; under AmeriCorps. The “Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act”, known as the GIVE Act, is slated for $6 billion over the next five years. After a great show of bipartisan interest in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIG Pranks America</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/114/aig-pranks-america</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/114/aig-pranks-america#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[april fool's day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the realization that April Fool's Day is just around the corner, I cannot help but wonder if AIG is pulling a fast one on the American people. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/114/aig-pranks-america/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History of Scandal – Past, Present, and Future?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the onslaught of every new politician into the political arena we see what seems like the same promise over and over, “I’m not like the other guys.”   Unfortunately with the passage of time and intensified scrutiny there are few to none that seem to be able to play the game of politics without at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See? They listened to me. Which has me even more confused.</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/66/see-they-listened-to-me-which-has-me-even-more-confused</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/66/see-they-listened-to-me-which-has-me-even-more-confused#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GummedCigarettePapers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I wrote about how we should give President Obama a break on the spending bill. Most of us borrow to get out of debt, right? Today I came across this video that shows Senator Schumer of NY agrees with me totally. You can see in his own words that he agrees with me. Most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/66/see-they-listened-to-me-which-has-me-even-more-confused/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s stimulus plan isn’t that much different than mine.</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/68/obama%e2%80%99s-stimulus-plan-isn%e2%80%99t-that-much-different-than-mine</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/68/obama%e2%80%99s-stimulus-plan-isn%e2%80%99t-that-much-different-than-mine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GummedCigarettePapers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=1171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know why there are so many people upset with this bail out plan. We have all been there haven&#8217;t we? You know, paying one credit card off with the other. I do it all the time. It works real swell. As long as I have income I have no problems.
Sing these next words [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/68/obama%e2%80%99s-stimulus-plan-isn%e2%80%99t-that-much-different-than-mine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our new President</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Berserker50</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the beginning of a new era in America, with Barack Obama being sworn in as President of the United States.  In midst of all the ruckus that has surrounded this Presidency, the time has now come for actions to be taken.  Words and talk will no longer be enough to win the hearts of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Appoints Intelligence Officials</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Granny4Life</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President-elect Barack Obama announced today his choices for director of national intelligence and CIA director. Obama chose Retired Navy Admiral Dennis Blair or national intelligence director and Leon Panetta, a former chief of staff to President Clinton, as CIA director.
“I am confident that Dennis Blair and Leon Panetta are the right leaders to advance the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Space</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/85/on-space</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/85/on-space#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/644/on-space</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my post below comparing 50 key votes from Obama and McCain, I overlooked their records on space policy.  Luckily, PopSci is on the case.
(h/t/ Instapundit)
    
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/85/on-space/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

