<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/category/white-house/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Wants You to Watch Fox News</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend, the White House gave Fox News a sharp elbow, restarting the periodic debate about whether Fox News is actually news. This is rather like asking whether Daffy Duck is actually the Chrysler Building. Of course it’s not. Everyone knows it’s not. Why would the White House bother to bring it up?[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/240/obama-wants-you-to-watch-fox-news/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legitimacy Matters</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/237/legitimacy-matters</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/237/legitimacy-matters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McChrystal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/237/legitimacy-matters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that in the weeks since Gen. McChrystal’s report was leaked, that the Afghanistan discussion has been limited by a false binary: Is it better to send more troops to protect civilians or is it better to draw down troops and increase air strikes on Al Qaeda targets? Since the success of a greater troop commitment ultimately relies on the legitimacy of the Afghan government, a third and probably far better option is to first establish how legitimate that government can possibly be.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/237/legitimacy-matters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP.com</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/233/gop-com</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/233/gop-com#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military & War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/233/gop-com</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been so much buzz about GOP.com that I had to check it out. And I am so, so, so glad I did[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/233/gop-com/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is TARP and Is TARP Working?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Bailout Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubled Assets Relief Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TARP is the Troubled Assets Relief Program introduced by Henry Paulson in September of 2008. TARP is also considered the mortgage bailout bill. Paulson claims this program is not to be a stimulus package. The purpose of this program is to take bad mortgages off the books of banks and mortgage lenders so they no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facts and History of the White House</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Built]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What facts and history of the White House do you know? In 1790, President George Washington declared the federal government should reside &#8220;not exceeding ten miles square&#8230;on the river Potomac.&#8221;  Then with Pierre L&#8217;Enfant, they chose the now 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue location for the White House and planned the future federal city around it.
The first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/179/history-and-facts-about-the-white-house/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama and Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/177/barack-obama-and-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/177/barack-obama-and-health-care-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly does Barack Obama&#8217;s Health Care Reform entail? The President makes it clear he wants every American to have affordable health care. But how do families living in and below the low-income to poverty-level afford health care when they currently rely government-provided free food and medical services? So, who will be foot the health care reform bills of those individuals?  President Obama [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/177/barack-obama-and-health-care-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Nancy Pelosi Run for President?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not confirmed if Nancy Pelosi will run for President. Dare we say &#8220;Let&#8217;s Hope Not!!&#8221;; she&#8217;s already third in line. The 2010 election campaigns are at their starting blocks so Nancy Pelosi is sure to be someones target.  She may not even manage to get reelected as House Speaker let alone run for President. What would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive Talk Radio vs. Conservative Talk Radio</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness Doctrine Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the battle of Progressive Talk Radio versus Conservative Talk Radio, a clear winner is up for debate. Fans of Progressive Talk Radio rely greatly on satellite or the Internet, where there&#8217;s less restrictions for a No Holds Barred format. Conservative Talk Radio seems to more often take the &#8216;informative&#8217; approach whereas the Progressive Talk [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s to Blame for Lousy Economy</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/142/whos-to-blame-for-lousy-economy</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/142/whos-to-blame-for-lousy-economy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lousy economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rising costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;s to blame for this lousy economy? We can blame the housing market bubble which popped, or the banking &#38; mortgage industries, or maybe the rising health care costs and skyrocketing insurance premiums which affect auto-makers, doctors&#8217; private sectors, small &#38; medium-size businesses. There&#8217;s also the ever-rising prices of food and utilities to blame. All the above is causing escalating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/142/whos-to-blame-for-lousy-economy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Announces Healthcare Reform Timeline</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reforms-timeline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a surprising gathering of healthcare moguls, President Obama announced his plan to reform healthcare in the United States. Even more surprising is the confident timeline he placed on the measure. Obama vowed by the end of 2009 to address three key issues related to US healthcare policy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/133/obama-announces-healthcare-reform-timeline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Cut Credit Cards</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama recently announced plans to reform complicated and misleading credit card practices.  It is going to be hard for critics to point out fault in Obama's plans without appearing crooked or unsympathetic in the eyes of the public. Reading that fine print has become essential to anybody signing up for a credit card, but with so many unfamiliar financial abbreviations, percentages and numbers to sort through, understanding exactly what you're signing up for can bring you to tears. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/130/clean-cut-credit-cards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Responsibility and Volunteerism: The Bread and Butter of Our New Society</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIVE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serve America Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volunteer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent expansion of AmeriCorps goes hand in hand with President Obama's plea with the American people to start volunteering and give special attention to community service. The plea came in his inaugural-address and later in a nationally televised speech to a joint session of Congress in February, shortly after taking office. The Senate passed a measure, named the Senator Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New AmeriCorps – To Give or Have to Give</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a surface level it seems almost silly not to be in support of a program intended to bring about aid to those in need across America, but opponents to the expansion of AmeriCorps raise several key points about the timing, cost, and in essence the “mandate” to serve.  The House has already backed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Buying Toxic Assets; Dow Jumps 497 Points; Hope Restored?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones industrial average]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some call it 'cash for trash', while Morgan Stanley believes it will do some good for the credit markets. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner revealed the Obama administration's plan to help buy up to $1 trillion in bad bank debt. These toxic assets have been weighing heavily on the financial and banking institutions, limiting their ability to loan money and making credit hard to come by for many families.  The plan was met with general approval from Wall Street investors, as the Dow Jones industrial average skyrocketed 497 points, making March 23, 2009 the fifth largest single-day point gain ever. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/122/toxic_assets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hugo Chavez: Obama an &#8220;Ignoramus&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignoramus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Sunday, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez shared his thoughts on new US President Barack Obama's policies and comments about the South American country's government. It wasn't pretty, although it fit appropriately with Chavez's stance toward the US. The remarks are reminiscent of comments made in a January interview that compared President Obama to his predecessor.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/120/hugo-chavez-obama-an-ignoramus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responsibility: Government and Media</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/117/responsibility-government-and-media</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/117/responsibility-government-and-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr America</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The source of information about our government is the all powerful, all knowing media.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/117/responsibility-government-and-media/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Endorsement Hurt Roger Wicker</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Wicker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although endorsed by other less controversial Republicans, the endorsement of Roger Wicker for Mississippi&#8217;s Senate seat by President Bush could spell doom for this appointed Senator. Taking office after the retirement of Trent Lott, Wicker is running for reelection. Bush pointed out his respect for his constituency and his colleagues, calling him and advocate for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History of Scandal – Past, Present, and Future?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the onslaught of every new politician into the political arena we see what seems like the same promise over and over, “I’m not like the other guys.”   Unfortunately with the passage of time and intensified scrutiny there are few to none that seem to be able to play the game of politics without at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/101/the-history-of-scandal-%e2%80%93-past-present-and-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our new President</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Berserker50</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the beginning of a new era in America, with Barack Obama being sworn in as President of the United States.  In midst of all the ruckus that has surrounded this Presidency, the time has now come for actions to be taken.  Words and talk will no longer be enough to win the hearts of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/76/our-new-president/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Appoints Intelligence Officials</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Granny4Life</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President-elect Barack Obama announced today his choices for director of national intelligence and CIA director. Obama chose Retired Navy Admiral Dennis Blair or national intelligence director and Leon Panetta, a former chief of staff to President Clinton, as CIA director.
“I am confident that Dennis Blair and Leon Panetta are the right leaders to advance the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/77/obama-appoints-intelligence-officials/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

