<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/category/supreme-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Progressive Talk Radio vs. Conservative Talk Radio</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness Doctrine Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the battle of Progressive Talk Radio versus Conservative Talk Radio, a clear winner is up for debate. Fans of Progressive Talk Radio rely greatly on satellite or the Internet, where there&#8217;s less restrictions for a No Holds Barred format. Conservative Talk Radio seems to more often take the &#8216;informative&#8217; approach whereas the Progressive Talk [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitution Party Denounces Supreme Court’s Ten Commandments Decision</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/96/constitution-party-denounces-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-ten-commandments-decision</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/96/constitution-party-denounces-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-ten-commandments-decision#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Granny4Life</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/96/constitution-party-denounces-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-ten-commandments-decision</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Constitution Party National Committee Press Release JUNE 28, 2005
LANCASTER, PA: “Decisions of the Supreme Court regarding public display of the Ten Commandments reflect a continuing disregard of the moral and legal principles upon which our nation was established,” observes William K. Shearer, spokesperson for, and past chairman of, the Constitution Party.
“To deny recognition of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/96/constitution-party-denounces-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-ten-commandments-decision/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

