<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticianScandal.com &#187; House of Representatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicianscandal.com/category/house-of-representatives/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicianscandal.com</link>
	<description>Political News &#38; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pelosi Power: What Does the Speaker of the House of Representatives Do?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/212/pelosi-power-what-does-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-representatives-do</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/212/pelosi-power-what-does-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-representatives-do#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>showse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/212/pelosi-power-what-does-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-representatives-do</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Speaker of the House of Representatives performs a variety of duties.  Democrat Nancy Pelosi—our current Speaker and the first woman, Californian, and Italian American to hold the position—serves in three main roles: representing her district, leading both her party and the House as a whole, and ensuring respectful behavior on the House floor.
As presiding [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/212/pelosi-power-what-does-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-representatives-do/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grayson&#8217;s Gage</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/211/graysons-gage</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/211/graysons-gage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/211/graysons-gage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representative Alan Grayson caused a stir in the House yesterday when he presented “the Republican healthcare bill.” It was quite simple: 1. Don’t get sick. 2. If you do get sick, die quickly.[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/211/graysons-gage/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accountability and Innovation</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/193/accountability-and-innovation</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/193/accountability-and-innovation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boourns104</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/193/accountability-and-innovation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics of financial regulation say, among many other things, that increased regulation will stifle innovation. Over the past year, it has become clear that many innovations are indistinguishable from scams, and these types of innovations should certainly be stifled.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/193/accountability-and-innovation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is TARP and Is TARP Working?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Bailout Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubled Assets Relief Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TARP is the Troubled Assets Relief Program introduced by Henry Paulson in September of 2008. TARP is also considered the mortgage bailout bill. Paulson claims this program is not to be a stimulus package. The purpose of this program is to take bad mortgages off the books of banks and mortgage lenders so they no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/189/what-is-tarp-and-is-tarp-working/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Long Has Nancy Pelosi Been In Office?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/173/how-long-has-nancy-pelosi-been-in-office</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/173/how-long-has-nancy-pelosi-been-in-office#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how long has nancy pelosi been in office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi has held a political office for the past 22 years. She has represented California&#8217;s Eighth District House of Representatives since 1987. Nancy Pelosi was the House Minority Leader from 2003 to 2007. She has also been a  senior member of California&#8217;s Eighth District&#8217;s House Appropriations Committee.  On January 4, 2007, she became Speaker of the House. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/173/how-long-has-nancy-pelosi-been-in-office/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Nancy Pelosi Run for President?</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not confirmed if Nancy Pelosi will run for President. Dare we say &#8220;Let&#8217;s Hope Not!!&#8221;; she&#8217;s already third in line. The 2010 election campaigns are at their starting blocks so Nancy Pelosi is sure to be someones target.  She may not even manage to get reelected as House Speaker let alone run for President. What would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/170/will-nancy-pelosi-run-for-president-in-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive Talk Radio vs. Conservative Talk Radio</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness Doctrine Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the battle of Progressive Talk Radio versus Conservative Talk Radio, a clear winner is up for debate. Fans of Progressive Talk Radio rely greatly on satellite or the Internet, where there&#8217;s less restrictions for a No Holds Barred format. Conservative Talk Radio seems to more often take the &#8216;informative&#8217; approach whereas the Progressive Talk [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/146/progressive-talk-radio-vs-conservative-talk-radio/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi’s Reelection Chances</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/137/nancy-pelosi%e2%80%99s-reelection-chances</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/137/nancy-pelosi%e2%80%99s-reelection-chances#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how long has nancy pelosi been in office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reelection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what state does nancy pelosi represent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/137/nancy-pelosi%e2%80%99s-reelection-chances</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP would love nothing more than to see Nancy Pelosi disappear. Yet Nancy Pelosi’s 2010 reelection chances still live although she’s killing President Obama’s efforts to raise the ethical standards in Washington. She’s openly defied America’s former and current Presidents and brazenly demonstrates she’ll fight to keep earmarks alive regardless of President Obama’s desire to banish them.  Too many overlook or dismiss her actions.  Remember, Nancy Pelosi’s the first House Speaker to fly to the Middle East for her own version of Peace Talks while failing to mention it to then President G.W. Bush and yet she STILL has chances of reelection.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/137/nancy-pelosi%e2%80%99s-reelection-chances/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich on Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ltfiggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Newt’s on a roll again with another hot topic; Health Care Reform. He has even founded the Center for Health Transformation which is researching and developing a new plan for better Health Care Reform without creating more taxes and cutting more jobs; just the type of plan American needs with its current economy. Newt strongly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/136/newt-gingrich-on-health-care-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fidel and Raul Castro Meet With Members of US Congress</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Delegation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba Embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Castro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking away from a meeting with Cuban President Raul Castro on Monday, the leader of a seven-member Congressional delegation, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), is convinced that the Cuban President would be willing to reexamine the diplomatic relationship between the United States and Cuba. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/128/castro-congress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Responsibility and Volunteerism: The Bread and Butter of Our New Society</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhobrock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIVE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serve America Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volunteer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent expansion of AmeriCorps goes hand in hand with President Obama's plea with the American people to start volunteering and give special attention to community service. The plea came in his inaugural-address and later in a nationally televised speech to a joint session of Congress in February, shortly after taking office. The Senate passed a measure, named the Senator Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/124/serve-america-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New AmeriCorps – To Give or Have to Give</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kschu7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a surface level it seems almost silly not to be in support of a program intended to bring about aid to those in need across America, but opponents to the expansion of AmeriCorps raise several key points about the timing, cost, and in essence the “mandate” to serve.  The House has already backed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/123/the-new-americorps-%e2%80%93-to-give-or-have-to-give/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GIVE Act Passed By House 321-105</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIVE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US House of Representatives passed a measure Wednesday, March 18th 2009, by a vote of 321-105 creating 175,000 &#8220;new service opportunities&#8221; under AmeriCorps. The “Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act”, known as the GIVE Act, is slated for $6 billion over the next five years. After a great show of bipartisan interest in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/119/give-act-passed-by-house-321-105/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edward Tinsley Represents Restaurant Industry</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/112/edward-tinsley-represents-restaurant-industry</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/112/edward-tinsley-represents-restaurant-industry#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Granny4Life</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Tinsley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/112/edward-tinsley-represents-restaurant-industry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Tinsley, Republican candidate for New Mexico&#8217;s 2nd Congressional District, claims if elected he will represent the restaurant industry in Congress. Having worked in the restaurant industry for many years, Tinsley now operates 19 K-Bob&#8217;s Steakhouses in New Mexico.
According to Tinsley, some of the challenges faces the industry are immigration reform for workers, the economy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/112/edward-tinsley-represents-restaurant-industry/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Endorsement Hurt Roger Wicker</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Wicker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although endorsed by other less controversial Republicans, the endorsement of Roger Wicker for Mississippi&#8217;s Senate seat by President Bush could spell doom for this appointed Senator. Taking office after the retirement of Trent Lott, Wicker is running for reelection. Bush pointed out his respect for his constituency and his colleagues, calling him and advocate for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/111/bush-endorsement-hurt-roger-wicker/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Murtha &amp; Mike Rogers &#8211; Pork Barrel</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/110/john-murtha-mike-rogers-pork-barrel</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/110/john-murtha-mike-rogers-pork-barrel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aztek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/110/john-murtha-mike-rogers-pork-barrel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican incumbent for Alabama&#8217;s 3rd Congressional District, Mike Rogers, angered Democratic Representative John Murtha in a motion to remove earmark spending from a bill. In a 2007 session of Congress, Rogers called for a $23 million earmark for the National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) in Johnstown, PA to be removed from the Intelligence Authorization Act. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/110/john-murtha-mike-rogers-pork-barrel/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marilyn Musgrave Defends &#8220;National Year of the Bible&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/109/marilyn-musgrave-defends-national-year-of-the-bible</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/109/marilyn-musgrave-defends-national-year-of-the-bible#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marilyn Musgrave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicianscandal.com/109/marilyn-musgrave-defends-national-year-of-the-bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A devout Pentecostal, Marilyn Musgrave has been increasingly defending her position on a resolution sponsored by the Congresswoman to declare 2007 the “National Year of the Bible.”
Pointing out that the first amendment does not give you freedom from religion, the resolution called for the President to issue a proclamation demanding all citizens rediscover the Bible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/109/marilyn-musgrave-defends-national-year-of-the-bible/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Green Economic Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://politicianscandal.com/83/a-green-economic-stimulus</link>
		<comments>http://politicianscandal.com/83/a-green-economic-stimulus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RSSFEED</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syntheticwombs.com/647/a-green-economic-stimulus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is only one thing left for Congress to do this session: come back after the November elections and try to pass an economic stimulus package for Main Street America.  One of the major Democratic priorities that has emerged for the stimulus  is investing &#8211; through tax cuts and new spending &#8211; in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicianscandal.com/83/a-green-economic-stimulus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
